Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 3423 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Dishonored 2 than Phenom X4 9650 - 263 vs 252 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 24 vs 4 threads
Dishonored 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
263
100%
Value, £/FPS
Price, £
£409.61
100%
FPS Winner
Buy for £409.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 282 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
20.272572402044293%
Multi-Core
765
10.966169724770642%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Agena | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |