Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7900X outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7900X is 3378 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-7900X - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7900X
- Performs up to 41% better in Starfield than Phenom X4 9650 - 58 vs 41 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 20 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
58
100%
Value, £/FPS
£7.39/FPS
100%
Price, £
£428.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £428.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
16.736990154711673%
Multi-Core
765
8.711991800478305%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | Intel Core i9-7900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i9 |
Agena | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |