Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Phenom X4 9650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 4485 days newer than Phenom X4 9650.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9650
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 95 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 15% better in F1 22 than Phenom X4 9650 - 281 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom X4 9650 - 24 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for £603.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 269 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
238
13.765182186234817%
Multi-Core
765
7.627118644067797%
AMD Phenom X4 9650 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Agena | Codename | Matisse |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 105 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
11.5x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |