Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 68 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 1% better in FIFA 23 than Core i9-10900 - 185 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - £499.0 vs £677.57
- Up to 27% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i9-10900 - £2.7 vs £3.7 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900 - 24 vs 20 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
185
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.7/FPS
100%
Price, £
£499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Buy for £677.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Matisse | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 20 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |