Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Phenom X4 9550 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 4044 days newer than Phenom X4 9550.
Advantages of AMD Phenom X4 9550
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 18% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Phenom X4 9550 - 131 vs 111 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Phenom X4 9550 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
131
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.83/FPS
100%
Price, £
£108.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £108.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Mar 27th, 2008
Single-Core
234
17.03056768558952%
Multi-Core
712
19.40583265194876%
AMD Phenom X4 9550 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Mar 27th, 2008 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Phenom X4 | Collection | Core i3 |
Agena | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM2+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
65 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
11.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |