Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 1330 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 4% better in The Outer Worlds than Celeron G3900 - 204 vs 196 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i3-9100F - £19.99 vs £120.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing The Outer Worlds than Core i3-9100F - £0.1 vs £0.59 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
196
96%
Value, £/FPS
£0.1/FPS
100%
Price, £
£19.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £19.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |