Buy on Amazon
£44.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 2794 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 6% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Phenom II X4 925 - 111 vs 105 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
111
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.41/FPS
100%
Price, £
£44.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930 Retail - (1151/Dual Core/2.90GHz/2MB/Kabylake/51W/Graphics) - BX80677G3930
Buy for £44.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2425 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Phenom II X4 925
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
52.63157894736842%
Multi-Core
930
89.16586768935763%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Phenom II X4 | Collection | Celeron |
| Deneb | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
