Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 1449 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Phenom II X4 925
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Performs up to 3% better in Borderlands 3 than Phenom II X4 925 - 197 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 6 vs 4 threads
Borderlands 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
FPS
197
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.2/FPS
100%
Price, £
£39.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2527 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Badass
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Single-Core
320
65.57377049180327%
Multi-Core
930
59.768637532133674%
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | FX |
Deneb | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |