Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Phenom II X4 925 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3845 days newer than Phenom II X4 925.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 3% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Phenom II X4 925 - 119 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Phenom II X4 925 - 35 vs 95 Watts
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
119
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.84/FPS
100%
Price, £
£100
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18555 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • May 11th, 2009
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Phenom II X4 925 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
May 11th, 2009 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Phenom II X4 | Collection | Athlon |
Deneb | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
14.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |