Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1940 days newer than the cheaper FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Up to 46% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - £189.97 vs £351.64
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 120% better in Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered than FX-9370 - 97 vs 44 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 180 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 24 vs 8 threads
Marvel’s Spider-Man Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £189.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
Buy for £351.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |