Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4250 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 61% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than FX-6200 - 285 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 32 vs 6 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
285
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.52/FPS
100%
Price, £
£433.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £433.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 426 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 24 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |