Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 3174 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 3% better in Control than FX-6200 - 205 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 32 vs 6 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
205
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.46/FPS
100%
Price, £
£299
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 442 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 16 |
6 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |