Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3964 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 15% better in God of War than FX-6200 - 187 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Core i5-13400F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 10 |
| 6 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
