Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 286 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - £159.71 vs £484.37
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 9% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i5-13400F - 253 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £159.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77405 minutes ago
Buy for £484.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77404 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Single-Core
2290
73.84714608190906%
Multi-Core
10745
51.16666666666667%
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |