Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 99 days older than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - £163.31 vs £440.41
- Up to 58% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i9-13900K - £0.67 vs £1.58 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 15% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-13400F - 279 vs 243 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
243
87%
Value, £/FPS
£0.67/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £163.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 432 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
279
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.58/FPS
42%
Price, £
£440.41
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for £440.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 433 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |