Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 286 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 10% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i5-13400F - 217 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - £163.25 vs £523.99
- Up to 66% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Core i9-14900K - £0.83 vs £2.41 per FPS
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
217
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.41/FPS
34%
Price, £
£523.99
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for £523.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
197
90%
Value, £/FPS
£0.83/FPS
100%
Price, £
£163.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £163.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 164 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900K | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |