Buy on Amazon
£499.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $749
Availability
MSRP in USD: $749
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3950X outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3950X is 2828 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3950X
- Performs up to 21% better in Lost Ark than FX-6200 - 268 vs 221 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 32 vs 6 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
268
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.87/FPS
100%
Price, £
£499.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 3950X Processor (16C/32T, 72 MB Cache, 4.7 GHz Max Boost)
Buy for £499.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Ryzen 9 3950X
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3950X |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Matisse |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 16 |
| 6 | Threads | 32 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
