Buy on Amazon
£470
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $499
Availability
MSRP in USD: $499
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3053 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 20% better in Valorant than FX-6200 - 813 vs 680 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 24 vs 6 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
813
100%
Value, £/FPS
£0.58/FPS
100%
Price, £
£470
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen™ 9 3900XT Processor (12C/24T, 70MB Cache, Up to 4.7 GHz Max Boost) – Without Cooler
Buy for £470 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58082 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Matisse |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 3 | Cores | 12 |
| 6 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
