Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2426 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 16% better in No Man's Sky than FX-6200 - 181 vs 156 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
181
100%
Value, £/FPS
£1.97/FPS
100%
Price, £
£356.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £356.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 810 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |