Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7840HS outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7840HS is 3986 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS
- Performs up to 32% better in Battlefield V than FX-6200 - 272 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Ryzen 7 7840HS
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Not Available |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 3 | Cores | 8 |
| 6 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 19.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
