Buy on Amazon
£59.97
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $299
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms the cheaper FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 1816 days newer than the cheaper FX-4350.
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 7 2700 - £59.97 vs £225.0
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 7% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-4350 - 340 vs 319 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4350 - 16 vs 4 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
AMD FX-4350 4-Core Processor (125W, AM3+, 12MB Cache, 4300MHz)
Buy for £59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75489 minutes ago
AMD YD2700BBAFBOX Ryzen 7 2700 Processor with Wraith Spire RGB LED Cooler
Buy for £225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75490 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4350 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
