Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon R7 260X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 2023 days newer than Radeon R7 260X.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 10% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon R7 260X - 66 vs 60 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 75 vs 115 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 4 vs 2 GB
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £144 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77406 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
33.033033033033036%
Texel Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
66.06606606606607%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$149 | MSRP | $139 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 104 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1100 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1625 MHz |