Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 260X outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 260X is 2093 days older than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Performs up to 9% better in The Outer Worlds than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 36 vs 33 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 65 vs 115 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 4 vs 2 GB
The Outer Worlds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £126.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74492 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
84.94208494208495%
Texel Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
67.27272727272727%
AMD Radeon R7 260X | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$139 | MSRP | $199 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1100 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1625 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |