Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 70 days older than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 63% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 31 vs 19 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Up to 12% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - £126.27 vs £144.0
- Consumes up to 13% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 65 vs 75 Watts
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £144 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74089 minutes ago
Buy for £126.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74089 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
38.888888888888886%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
44.44444444444444%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$149 | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |