Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1630 outperforms Radeon R7 260X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1630 is 3185 days newer than Radeon R7 260X.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
- Performs up to 2% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Radeon R7 260X - 338 vs 333 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 75 vs 115 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 4 vs 2 GB
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for £159.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74469 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
61.62464985994398%
Texel Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 28th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
28.56 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
57.12 GTexel/s
92.72727272727272%
AMD Radeon R7 260X | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 28th, 2022 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$139 | MSRP | Not Available |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.0, 1x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1100 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1740 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1785 MHz |
1625 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |