Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is 1038 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 3100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Performs up to 22% better in No Man's Sky than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 82 vs 67 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 30 vs 65 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
54%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
54%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 12th, 2017 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| 1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
