Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280X outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280X is 1343 days older than Radeon Pro WX 3100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 65 vs 250 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 4 vs 3 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Performs up to 36% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 19 vs 14 FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Radeon R9 280X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
60%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
30%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
Jun 12th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| Radeon Pro | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$199 | MSRP | $299 |
| 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 850 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
