Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 1196 days older than Radeon Pro WX 3100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 65 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 4 vs 3 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 21% better in Hogwarts Legacy than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 23 vs 19 FPS
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
65%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
37%
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 12th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| Radeon Pro | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$199 | MSRP | $279 |
| 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
