Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 1014 days older than Radeon Pro WX 3100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 65 vs 190 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 10% better in Ready or Not than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 100 vs 91 FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro WX 3100
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
66%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
37%
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 12th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| Radeon Pro | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$199 | MSRP | $249 |
| 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 96 GB/s | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
| 1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
