Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTS 450 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1809 days newer than GeForce GTS 450.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 106 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 59% better in World of Tanks than GeForce GTS 450 - 161 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 - 4 vs 1 GB
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTS 450
Desktop • Sep 13th, 2010
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTS 450
Desktop • Sep 13th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
6.264 GPixel/s
9%
Texel Fillrate
25.06 GTexel/s
9%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 13th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 400 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
$129 | MSRP | $649 |
| 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 57.73 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 783 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
902 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
