Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms GeForce GTS 450 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 1450 days newer than GeForce GTS 450.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 106 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 46% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than GeForce GTS 450 - 35 vs 24 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 - 2 vs 1 GB
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 13th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Sep 13th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
6.264 GPixel/s
21%
Texel Fillrate
25.06 GTexel/s
24%
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
---|---|---|
Sep 13th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
GeForce 400 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$129 | MSRP | $249 |
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
57.73 GB/s | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
783 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
902 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |