Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Radeon Pro 5300M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1539 days older than Radeon Pro 5300M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 85 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 13% better in No Man's Sky than Radeon Pro 5300M - 97 vs 86 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Nov 13th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
---|---|---|
Nov 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | HBM |
128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
1250 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |