Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro 5300M outperforms Radeon R9 280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro 5300M is 2080 days newer than Radeon R9 280.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 5300M
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Warcraft than Radeon R9 280 - 148 vs 139 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 85 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 4 vs 3 GB
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Radeon Pro 5300M
Mobile • Nov 13th, 2019
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
74%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro 5300M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1250 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
