Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 1112 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-1660 v4.
Advantages of Xeon E5-1660 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 11% better in Starfield than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 61 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 73% cheaper than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $84.68 vs $317.44
- Up to 76% better value when playing Starfield than Xeon E5-1660 v4 - $1.39 vs $5.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1660 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €317.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7203 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
61
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.39/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.68
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €84.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7202 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1660 v4 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |