Key Differences
In short — Xeon w3-2435 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon w3-2435 is 1183 days newer than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon w3-2435
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Athlon 3000G - 220 vs 213 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w3-2435 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon w3-2435
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon w3-2435 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
Feb 15th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Athlon |
| Sapphire Rapids | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 4677 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
