Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 1899 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 35 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Athlon 3000G - 117 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 24 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Athlon | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Picasso | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
