Key Differences
In short — Xeon w3-2435 outperforms Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon w3-2435 is 1409 days newer than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U.
Advantages of Intel Xeon w3-2435
- Performs up to 22% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 196 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w3-2435 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon w3-2435
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon w3-2435 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
Feb 15th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Sapphire Rapids | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 4677 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 15 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
