Key Differences
In short — Xeon w3-2435 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon w3-2435 is 3131 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Xeon w3-2435
- Performs up to 22% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-4160T - 196 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon w3-2435 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon w3-2435
Server/Workstation • Feb 15th, 2023
Core i3-4160T
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon w3-2435 | vs | Intel Core i3-4160T |
|---|---|---|
Feb 15th, 2023 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Xeon W | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sapphire Rapids | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 4677 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
