Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 651 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 11% better in World of Tanks than Celeron G6900 - 597 vs 540 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $36.56 vs $316.68
- Up to 86% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i9-14900K - $0.08 vs $0.59 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
597
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
14%
Price, €
€351.52
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €351.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
540
90%
Value, €/FPS
€0.08/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €40.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900K | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |