Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 425 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 7% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G6900 - 144 vs 135 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 86% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5950X - $36.56 vs $255.18
- Up to 85% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen 9 5950X - $0.3 vs $1.97 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5950X doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €283.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
135
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €40.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
Vermeer | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |