Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 365 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 18% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G6900 - 212 vs 179 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 93% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $36.56 vs $504.51
- Up to 91% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - $0.23 vs $2.64 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €560.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 86 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
179
84%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.58
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €40.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raphael | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | Not Available |
5 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |