Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600K is 266 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 44% better in The Callisto Protocol than Celeron G6900 - 181 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-13600K - $40.58 vs $186.68
- Up to 68% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Core i5-13600K - $0.36 vs $1.14 per FPS
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
181
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.14/FPS
32%
Price, €
€207.21
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €207.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
126
70%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €45.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13600K | vs | Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |