Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 425 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600X - $40.58 vs $96.18
- Up to 57% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 5 5600X - $0.26 vs $0.60 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 5% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Celeron G6900 - 178 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
170
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €45.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Buy for €106.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |