Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 375 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - $45.04 vs $166.67
- Up to 70% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen 5 7600 - $0.23 vs $0.77 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 13% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G6900 - 217 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
192
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€45.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €45.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7112 minutes ago
Buy for €166.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7113 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |