Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4068 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 78% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-4130 - 784 vs 440 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $61.42 vs $316.68
- Up to 67% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-14900K - $0.15 vs $0.45 per FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
784
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
33%
Price, €
€351.52
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for €351.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Buy for €68.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900K | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Oct 17th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |