Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3356 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 25% better in Overwatch 2 than FX-4130 - 397 vs 317 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $16.76 vs $392.64
- Up to 95% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-12900K - $0.06 vs $1.1 per FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €435.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9850 minutes ago
Buy for €18.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9849 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |