Buy on Amazon
€188.29
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $564
Availability
MSRP in USD: $564
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $112
Availability
MSRP in USD: $112
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3356 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield 1 than FX-4130 - 258 vs 229 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - $38.04 vs $169.63
- Up to 76% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-12900KF - $0.18 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-12900KF
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
258
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
23.684210526315788%
Price, €
€188.29
22%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-12900KF Gaming Desktop Processor 16 (8P+8E) Cores up to 5.2 GHz Unlocked LGA1700 600 Series Chipset 125W
Buy for €188.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
FPS
229
88.75968992248062%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€42.22
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-4130 FX4130 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD4130FRW4MGU FD4130FRGUBOX 3.8GHz 4MB 4 cores
Buy for €42.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-12900KF
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900KF | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Core i9 | Collection | FX |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.