Buy on Amazon
€142.04
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $449
Availability
MSRP in USD: $449
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $112
Availability
MSRP in USD: $112
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the cheaper FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 2992 days newer than the cheaper FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 13% better in Rocket League than FX-4130 - 759 vs 671 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X - $16.76 vs $127.96
- Up to 84% better value when playing Rocket League than Ryzen 7 5800X - $0.03 vs $0.19 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X 8-core, 16-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for €142.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3667 minutes ago
AMD FX-Series FX-4130 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.8 GHz 4M 125W Socket AM3+
Buy for €18.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3666 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Ryzen 7 5800X
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FX-4130
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
| Vermeer | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.