Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1721 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 17% better in Lost Ark than Ryzen 5 2600 - 289 vs 248 FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $113.63 vs $689.87
- Up to 81% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i5-13400F - $0.51 vs $2.65 per FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
289
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.65/FPS
19%
Price, €
€765.76
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 139 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
248
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€126.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €126.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-13400F | vs | Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |