Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 1622 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2600.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 2600
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - $126.13 vs $446.27
- Up to 69% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen 9 7950X - $0.59 vs $1.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 65 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 10% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Ryzen 5 2600 - 236 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
215
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.59/FPS
100%
Price, €
€126.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €126.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7184 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
236
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.89/FPS
31%
Price, €
€446.27
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €446.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7183 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 5 2600 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 170 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |